7 Reasons Why My Social Music Site Never Took Off
June 30, 2008 – 2:39 pm

I read posts on Hacker News about “Why my start-up failed” and found them interesting because its a raw start-up story not the fairy tales that magazines like to write about. So here is my shot at it.

Last summer, I started developing a social music site, Contrastream. The problem: finding good indie music was difficult and a good reason why the 5 big labels control everything. The solution: a Digg-inspired site where you submit albums you want to share and vote up the ones you think are worth listening too, each album gets its own page with a YouTube music video, comments, etc.

7 Reasons Why it Never Took Off

  1. Design Perfection, I’ve heard its common for founders to spend too much time doing what they like or what they are good at. For me it was spending too much time perfecting the design. Not only how it looks but all the aspects of user experience. This would of been a good thing if I was a designer on a team but there was a lot more I should of been doing. Adding content, SEO, getting press, writing blog posts, and getting to know the early community to name a few.
  2. Underestimated the “Cold Start” problem, I read this article by Bokado Social Design which talks about a big issue you face with a social site, especially when it relies on user generated content. The value you provide to your users centers around the content on the site, so to build a user-base you need a lot of content created by the first users to kick off the community. In my case it was having interesting new indie albums always on the site. But user content usually follows the 80/20/1 rule, 80% browse, 20% interact (comment), and 1% contribute (add albums). So even though I had 10,000 people visiting in the early months, I still ended up adding 75% of the content. It was very demanding and time consuming especially being a solo founder.
  3. Market Size vs Business Model, the market I was targeting with the site, indie fans who knew a lot about music outside of the usual review sites, was small. I had planned to monetize the site with ads and in the process I realized that you need a LOT of people using your site everyday to make money off of ads, or a certain type of people who can’t tell the difference from adsense and site links. The people I was targeting were also notorious for not clicking on ads (similar to the tech community).
  4. Bad launch, the launch of the site wasn’t planned very well at all. I decided to use the “genius” marketing ploy of having a private beta to create scarcity. I saw a bunch of other sites doing it and figured it was a good strategy. I was wrong. Private betas are good for sites that have either complex technology or something thats hard to scale, and those two are about the only times you should do that.After the site appeared to be ready to go live, I decided to email Techcrunch about it. At the time I didn’t understand the importance these types of blogs put on exclusives. I figured they would take a day or two and send some questions. But about an hour or two after I emailed them, Techcrunch posted about Contrastream.

    Not only was I unprepared to have thousands of people come to my site right away, it turns out I didn’t get the chance to fully pitch my site to TC. Michael Arrington called the number I had posted in the whois and privacy policy which was my co-founders cell phone. I had used his because my phone was broken at the time. He called at about 11pm and my friend was sleeping, he also had no idea who Michael Arrington, an internet celebrity to most tech founders, was. In his half-asleep state he didn’t know what the call was about. I didn’t find out about the call until my friend had woken up a couple hours later and decided to tell me about it… so we were off to a good start.

  5. Competition, we had a lot of high quality competitors. We were offering information on great albums and community voting. But other sites like Last.fm and Hype Machine were offering the actual music. That was a competitive advantange thats hard to beat and we lacked a significant userbase to convince enough people.
  6. Motivation, having to consistently find new content was probably the biggest hit to my motivation for the site. As much as I loved indie music it was draining to constantly find new albums to post up. It turned something I liked doing into a chore mainly because at the same time I was busy marketing the site, redesigning it, and attending classes. (I was in college for business for 18 hours of the week).
  7. Co-founder, I had started the site with a friend, he was smart and knew a lot about business but in the end could not contribute much to the site. One reason why was that hes not technical, so he couldn’t help much with the development of the site and knowing who Michael Arrington was might of helped. The other reason was that he wasn’t really into indie music so providing content and reaching out to the users was a barrier.
  8. Bonus: Derivative Idea, I tried to avoid just listing the common start-up mistakes written by Paul Graham, but this one was pretty accurate. The idea itself for Contrastream wasn’t to innovative or original. It was inspired by Digg.com which had applied the same model to news and articles on the web. I still believe applying this model to music is interesting and useful, but there were so many other me-too digg sites. It was simple software to develop and it could be applied to almost anything. Plus there were open source PHP versions of it available on the web.

4 Important Things I learned in the Process

  1. Ruby on Rails + Mac, I had used PHP+MySQL professionally in my last year of high school but had become rusty over the years. I decided to learn Ruby on Rails to develop Contrastream and I’m completely convince it was the right decision. This is a language that lets you build applications quickly and stay agile. Like most rails developers I also bought a Mac which is another thing I’m completely convinced about, OSX has some of the best designed software.
  2. How to Get Press, I learned the importance of having something interesting to say, how to leverage a product launch to get press, and the other basics like press releases and messages.
  3. Practical “Getting Real”, I’ve read this book twice and had the opportunity to apply almost everything with Contrastream. Great way to learn something.
  4. Niche Social Networks are not Businesses, they are communities. They have to be built like a community. That means spending a lot of time building relationships, knowing everything about the niche, and finding users. You can monetize a niche social network but its really important that you don’t approach it like a business.

Bottom line, I learned more from starting this site then I would ever have from college business classes or reading blogs. As a music site it has hasn’t exactly “failed” at the moment, it still pulls in around 3000 people a month mainly from search engines. I now consider it a hobby site and I’m looking forward to applying what I learned with my next start-up, Integrate.



Tech Start-ups + Government Programs = Bad Mix
June 25, 2008 – 6:18 pm

Ontario Small Business Summer CompanyThis summer I began to work on my start-up Integrate, a SaaS sales management application (more info here), and decided to see what options I had as a young entrepreneur. Getting free help and capital is always good.

I found a few that sounded useful, but one that stood out was the Ontario Summer Company program run by the Ministry of Small Business; mainly because the deadline for applying was coming up in a few weeks.

Summer Company Program
The program offers 15-29 year olds starting a company a $3000 grant and some basic business consulting.

I decided early on that this time I was going to take all the traditional and legitimate steps to creating a business, for example registering the name, getting a tax id etc. I saw this program as away to force me into doing all these things.

To get in you just have to submit an application, which includes a business and a financial plan. If you get past that stage you are invited to come in for a meeting to see if you’re the right “fit” for the program.

Side note: I really recommend making a business and a financial plan. This might seem like some overplayed advice but asking yourself the right questions is a necessity. I recommend this at Sequoia Capital.

The Meeting
I spent the weekend making up the plans and sent in my application.

Right out of the gate I saw it as a 50-50 chance of getting into the program. How much would they really know about starting a high-tech company thats targeted at large corporate companies?

I figured they would be used to having kids come in with low-end business ideas like selling swimming lessons or walking dogs.

The usual governments policy to create growth in the economy through entrepreneurship is akin to throwing mud at the wall and seeing what sticks. It usually involves creating as many companies as possible without considering the quality of the opportunities.
- Scott A. Shane, Illusions of Entrepreneurship

About a week later I had a meeting with a lady who ran the local small business office at Town Hall. She started off by saying how she liked my business idea, ambition, and how she was surprised I could build a prototype in a few months (I had showed her an early version).

She went on to say that she wasn’t sure the people above her, who made the final decision, would be convinced for a few important reasons.

  1. They want finished products: At the time of the meeting. It had about a month left of development. They prefer that it’s ready to be sold when the program starts. Which cuts out almost every software company that needs to develop and actual product or service.
  2. There was no guarantee I’d make a sale before the summer ended. When the government looks at the program to see if it was a success they need to say we started x many companies which made x amount of dollars, not whether the company had any real value.

This is where I realized the reality of the program and most government entrepreneur programs. They foster companies with low-barriers to entry, requires little capital to create, and in bad industries.

But isn’t the real point not to create sustainable companies but to teach kids how to make a company?

That’s understandable, so after hearing that I asked her politely: what type of company is an ideal fit for this program? She smiled and spoke about how a few years ago a young guy had started a company selling t-shirts who eventually got in the news giving their program good publicity.

Everyone hears the statistic that 90% of businesses fail after around 7 years. But after reading The Illusions of Entrepreneurship by Scott A. Shane I’ve realized it’s mainly because people often chose bad opportunities and fail before they leave the gate.

Most entrepreneurs don’t select the most profitable industries but instead pick industries with the highest firm failure rates. Entrepreneurs don’t select industries because they are good for start-ups but rather because they know these industries and its easy to start a business in them.
- Scott A. Shane, Illusions of Entrepreneurship

Selling t-shirts is the definition of the type of company that is most likely to fail for a few key reasons.

  1. Saturated market: Everyone thinks they know how to make t-shirts, and there’s no shortage of them trying.
  2. Low barrier: It hardly costs anything to make a few t-shirts.
  3. Feasability: the only way to make any real money is to get distribution in channels where big companies have had locked down for decades.

If your going to teach someone who to make a company the number one goal should be to help them identify what a good business opportunity is. I can go to the library or online to figure out what the different between a partnership and sole proprietorship is… the technical details are secondary.

The Result
My 50-50 bet came back as “we’re sorry, your have been declined for the program”, at least she still offered to help with the technical details (registering the company & name).

I did come out of the experience optimistic though; the more these programs grow and help maintain that 90% failure rate, the less competition I will have to deal with.



dMix.ca is Now Live
June 12, 2008 – 7:37 pm

I have moved my site from danmcgrady.com to dmix.ca and did a complete redesign.

Why did I switch to dmix.ca?

I always thought have your name as your domain was self-indulgent but it made it easy to find when you searched it on Google. Also, it was easy to tell people what it was and remember.

But it wasn’t creative, and what email would I use? dan@danmcgrady.com didn’t sound right, either did hi@ or info@ that I see a lot of people use.

Entrepreneurship

The other reason I redid the site was to shift its focus to what I’m doing now, starting a tech business, and not what was doing a few years ago, which was mostly just design work, when I made the site.

If your going to make a site you should at least contribute something to the internet; not just talk about yourself.

So I picked up dmix.ca which sounds good and is only 4 letters which isn’t too common and my new email is officially dan@dmix.ca.



Now with Wordpress
June 12, 2008 – 5:53 pm

I finally set-up a wordpress blog which I’ve been meaning to do for a while. I am not aiming to reach a huge amount of people; this is just mainly to have a platform in place if I ever need to communicate something publically. Especially when I go full-time creating my next start up.

A few things I will be posting about:

  • Experiences starting a technology start-up
  • Ruby on Rails tutorials that I couldn’t find anywhere else
  • Thoughts about indie music and some links to albums
  • Creating companies in Toronto (aka complaining about government programs)
  • User experience design in web applications

I will be posting about once a week or whenever I get the chance.